Sentrix

Compare · Drata

Sentrix vs Drata

Sentrix vs Drata: subscription scope and regional frameworks. What each platform includes for Canada, the United States and Europe, as of July 2026.

Sentrix vs Drata: subscription scope and regional frameworks.

Drata is a well-regarded compliance automation platform built for SaaS companies pursuing SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Sentrix targets the same starting point, then widens the scope: third-party risk, policy management and license optimization in the same subscription, with frameworks shipped for Canada, the United States and Europe.

What differs, as of July 2026

The table is limited to differences a buyer can verify. It reflects public information from July 2026; verify current capabilities with each vendor.

CriterionSentrixDrata
Subscription scopeCompliance, third-party risk, policy management and license optimization in one subscriptionCompliance and policy management; see the public documentation for plan composition and optional modules
SOC 2 and ISO 27001YesYes
Frameworks for CanadaLaw 25, PIPEDA, CPCSC, TGV, OSFI B-10 and B-13, CAN/DGSI 104See Drata's published framework list
Frameworks for the United StatesSOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, CMMC, NIST CSF, NIST SP 800-53, NIST AI RMFSOC 2 and ISO 27001 confirmed; see the published list for the others
Frameworks for Europe and internationalISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, NIS2, DORA, TISAXSee Drata's published framework list
Interface languagesEnglish and FrenchSee Drata's public documentation
Data hostingCompliance data hosted in CanadaSee Drata's public documentation

The fundamental difference

Drata was designed from the ground up for SaaS companies pursuing SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and it excels at that use case: polished onboarding, a large integration catalogue and a large customer base in the tech sector. Its framework library and roadmap reflect that home market.

Sentrix was designed around a wider scope. Evidence collected once feeds compliance, vendor assessment, policies and license review. Frameworks ship by region: for Canada, Law 25, PIPEDA, CPCSC, TGV and the OSFI guidelines; for the United States, SOC 2, HIPAA, CMMC and the NIST frameworks; for Europe, GDPR, NIS2 and DORA. Crosswalks between frameworks are pre-built, the interface is offered in English and French, and compliance data is hosted in Canada.

For an organization that processes personal information of Quebec residents, Law 25 imposes specific obligations around privacy impact assessments, incident notification and agreements for communication outside Quebec. Adapting a control library built for another market to those obligations through custom mapping is possible, but it requires consulting time and ongoing maintenance. A framework that ships preconfigured avoids that work.

Who each platform is built for

Choose Sentrix if…

  • Your organization processes personal information of Quebec residents (Law 25) or of the European Union (GDPR)
  • You are a defence supplier pursuing CPCSC, or a federally regulated financial institution subject to OSFI guidelines B-10 and B-13
  • Your contracts or policies require compliance evidence to be hosted in Canada
  • You need compliance, third-party risk, policy management and license governance from one subscription
  • Your team works in French or serves French-speaking stakeholders

Choose Drata if…

  • Your organization is US-based and primarily pursuing SOC 2 Type II
  • You need a large catalogue of pre-built integration connectors for a US-first tech stack
  • Your compliance program is entirely within US regulatory scope
  • You are already deeply integrated with Drata's ecosystem and have no Canadian- or Europe-specific requirements

Go further

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on publicly available information as of July 2026. Product features, pricing, and data residency options change - we recommend verifying current capabilities directly with each vendor. All product names, logos, and trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners. Use of competitor names is for descriptive comparison purposes only under nominative fair use.

See Sentrix on your real infrastructure.

30-minute demo. No slides. Your actual compliance posture.

Contact us

Frequently asked questions

What is Law 25?
Quebec's Law 25 amends the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector. It sets specific obligations: privacy impact assessments before certain projects, notification of confidentiality incidents to the Commission d'accès à l'information, agreements governing communication of personal information outside Quebec, and consent tied to a stated purpose. It applies to organizations that process personal information of Quebec residents.
What is PIPEDA?
The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA, LPRPDE in French) is the Canadian federal law governing the collection, use and disclosure of personal information in the course of commercial activities. Most Quebec private-sector organizations are subject to it in addition to Law 25, which is why a documented crosswalk between the two regimes matters.
What do OSFI guidelines B-10 and B-13 require?
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions regulates federally regulated financial institutions. Guideline B-10 requires an outsourcing risk management program covering due diligence, contract provisions, ongoing monitoring and concentration risk. Guideline B-13 sets expectations for technology and cyber risk management: governance, risk identification, protection, detection, response and recovery.

Let's talk about your compliance program.

Last updated: 2026-09-17